On January 17, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to accept and review People v. Delacy, 192 Cal. App. 4th 1481 (2011), review denied (June 8, 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-290, 2012 WL 117549 (U.S. Jan. 17, 2012).
In his Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, lawyers with the Michel & Associates law firm representing Mr. Delacy asked the Supreme Court to decide whether language from its 2008 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) concerning “presumptively lawful” restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms allowed courts to simply hold restrictions on the Second Amendment rights of those with certain misdemeanor convictions to be constitutional without being subjected to any level of heightened judicial scrutiny. The Delacy case also touched on what level of judicial scrutiny should apply to an Equal Protection challenge asserting the government is creating discriminatory classifications that deprive those so classified of their Second Amendment rights.
Even though the Supreme Court requested a response to the Delacy petition from the government in October 2011 – an unusual move that shows the high court had unusual interest in the case – Delacy ended up being another in a line of recent Second Amendment-related cases which the Supreme Court declined to accept for review.
I’m not a big computer guy. I cringe at the mere thought of having to check my e-mail for the first time every morning. I have no idea why I would need a terabyte, over a gigabyte or a megabyte. But, the reality is, in order to function at an efficient level in today’s world, you have to familiarize yourself with the use of present day technology. I’m not saying you have to be able to write code or design software, but you do need to know how people are communicating, conducting business, and interacting. As an organization, especially a membership organization, you will either sweep up using technology or you will get swept up by it. Our CRPA is no different. Managed, predictable change is good. Forced, unanticipated change is not.